IPA Newspack
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets

IPA /

IPA Special

IPA Special

Delhi High Court Verdict On Begging Has Wide Ramifications

By Amritananda Chakravorty

In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court decriminalised begging in Delhi, and struck down many provisions of the Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 (‘BPBA’), as extended to the National Capital Territory of Delhi in 1960. In a decision given by the Acting Chief Justice, Gita Mittal, and Justice C. Hari Shankar, and authored by Justice Mittal, the Delhi High Court held that the Act, in so far as it criminalised begging per se, was unconstitutional and deserved to be struck down.

The petition was filed by the former bureaucrat and activist, Mr. Harsh Mander and others, in 2009 challenging the validity of the BPGA on the ground that it violated the fundamental rights of equality, freedom of speech, right against arbitrary detention, and dignity of people guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Constitution. Primarily, the Petitioners argued that the Act is overbroad, and covers all those who are not necessarily begging, but are poor or homeless, and assumed to be begging. Further, it was argued that Article 19(1)(a) protects speech, including the right to seek alms, while the fundamental right to life and liberty includes the right to take all measures to survive, including by soliciting alms, under Article 21.

Though the Delhi Government did not oppose the petitions, the Central Government had a curious argument, wherein it stated that in order to ‘ascertain whether a person is doing begging owing to poverty, which should not be criminalised, or due to other reasons, he/she ought to be detained in the home, and investigated.

The term ‘begging’ is defined in Section 2(1)(i)(a) as soliciting or receiving alms in a public place, whether or not under any pretense such as singing, dancing, fortune telling, performing or offering any article for sale; entering any private premises for soliciting alms, and having no visible means of subsistence, and wandering about or remaining in any public place in such condition, which makes it likely that the person subsists by soliciting or receiving alms, amongst others. In effect, the law criminalises poverty, and the poor people, who have no other means of subsistence, except begging. Section 4 provides for arrest of a person found to be begging by a police officer without a warrant, while Section 5 provides for detention in ‘certified institutions’ after a summary enquiry.

It is this aspect that the Delhi High Court found as an affront to the constitutional values and principles on the basis of which the country was founded. The High Court noted that “in our constitutional framework that promises every person the right to live with dignity, can the State criminalise begging?” It further noted that “criminalising begging is a wrong approach to deal with the underlying causes of the problem. It ignores the reality that people who beg are the poorest of the poor and marginalised in society. Criminalising begging violates the most fundamental rights of some of the most vulnerable people in our society. People in this stratum do not have access to basic necessities such a food, shelter, and health, and in addition criminalising them denies them the basic fundamental right to communicate and seek to deal with such plight.”

Thus, the High Court categorically held that the State has failed in its constitutional obligation to provide a decent life with dignity to all its citizens, and to criminalise begging would be to penalise people for being poor, which is an anathema to constitutional morality and standards. The High Court also found BPBA to be manifestly arbitrary, since it did not distinguish between voluntary and involuntary begging, as well as between begging and being homeless or without subsistence.

Though BPBA still subsists, and only its application to Delhi has been struck down, and similar such laws exist in almost 20 States and Union Territories, this decision is a hugely welcome decision. The criminalising of begging had its roots in the colonial vagrancy laws as well as public loitering laws, which tended to invisibilise poverty and poor individuals, from the vicinity of public spaces. At the same time, the decision fails to note the disproportionate impact of the anti-begging laws on sex workers and transgender persons, who are routinely detained under such laws ostensibly for begging, but mostly for occupying public spaces, and kept in the institutions for months on end, without any legal redress. The impact of anti-begging laws on these marginalised and criminalised groups is well-documented so it is surprising how it failed to find a mention in the judgment. Pertinently, the hijra/transgender groups are routinely harassed by the police for engaging in their traditional practice of toli/badhai, i.e., seeking alms in exchange for blessing on marriage, child birth, etc, since it amounts to soliciting alms prohibited under the Act.

Following this decision, the State Governments would either amend their begging prohibition laws, or similar such petitions would be entertained by other High Courts. It is very clear that in a constitutional democracy like ours, being poor and undertaking measures to survive, including by soliciting alms, cannot be penalised by any means. [Harsh Mander v UOI, Writ Petition (Civil) 10498/2009, date of judgment: 08.08.2018] (IPA Service)

The post Delhi High Court Verdict On Begging Has Wide Ramifications appeared first on Newspack by India Press Agency.

IPA Newspack

Politics

Kejriwal seeks ‘one chance’ to AAP from people of Haryana

June 9, 2023
Politics

BJP questions ‘Mohabbat Ki Dukaan’ in Gandhi family

June 9, 2023
Politics

Cong pulls up K’taka minister for cow slaughter remark

June 9, 2023
Politics

Cong hits back at Jaishankar over Rahul Gandhi remarks

June 9, 2023
Politics

AIADMK backs DMK in tussle with Governor Ravi

June 9, 2023
IPA Special

Narendra Modi’s Real Political Capital Is On Test In Lok Sabha Polls

June 8, 2023
IPA Special

JD(S) Looking For Ways To Remain Relevant After Debacle In Karnataka Polls

June 8, 2023
IPA Special

Law Commission’s Backing Of Section 124A Of Sedition Law Is Disappointing

June 8, 2023
IPA Special

Commissioning Of K-FON Is The Real Kerala Story

June 8, 2023
IPA Special

Centre Has To Take Proper Lessons For Safety From Balasore Disaster

June 8, 2023
IPA Special

RSS Holds Modi’s Image And Hindutva Are Not Enough To Win Elections

June 8, 2023
IPA Special

Joining NATO Under US Pressure Would Be A Strategic Blunder For India

June 8, 2023
Politics

Chargesheet without arrest is ‘compromise’ in wrestlers case

June 8, 2023
Politics

Pawar says even small issues being given religious colour

June 8, 2023
Politics

Shekhawat blasts Gehlot for obsession with saving ‘kursi’

June 8, 2023
Politics

Akhilesh pledges SP support to Kejriwal on ordinance issue

June 8, 2023
Happening Now

Indian students face deportation risk for fake Canada admissions

June 8, 2023
IPA Special

BJP Is Not Having Smooth Sailing In Uttar Pradesh Before Lok Sabha Polls

June 7, 2023
IPA Special

Oil Market Hinges On Possibility Of Saudi Production Cut Extension Beyond July

June 7, 2023
IPA Special

Rahul Gandhi Has Finally Given A Jolt To Narendra Modi In Indian Diaspora

June 7, 2023

An appeal

The legacy of IPA, founded by Nikhil Chakravartty, the doyen of journalism in India, to keep the flag of independent media flying high, is facing the threat of extinction due to the effect of the Covid pandemic. Only an emergency funding can avert such an eventuality. We appeal to all those who believe in the freedom of expression to contribute to this noble cause.
Click here to learn more

Share

Reply

  • 0
More on IPA

Narendra Modi’s Real Political Capital Is On Test In Lok Sabha Polls

June 8, 2023 4:04 pm | IPA Staff

By Dr. Gyan Pathak Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s real political worth is now on test. The wave of Hindu communal polarization has been ebbing almost...

IPA Special

JD(S) Looking For Ways To Remain Relevant After Debacle In Karnataka Polls

June 8, 2023 4:03 pm | IPA Staff

By Sushil Kutty Whether or not the Janata Dal (S) joins the Opposition’s joint efforts to forge unity for the 2024 general elections does not...

IPA Special

Law Commission’s Backing Of Section 124A Of Sedition Law Is Disappointing

June 8, 2023 4:01 pm | IPA Staff

By Krishna Jha On June 1, there had been reports that the law panel backed the penal provision for the offence of sedition, saying repealing...

IPA Special

Commissioning Of K-FON Is The Real Kerala Story

June 8, 2023 3:14 pm | IPA Staff

By P. Sreekumaran THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: This is the real Kerala story. The reference is to the commissioning, on June 5, of the first phase of the...

IPA Special

Narendra Modi’s Real Political Capital Is On Test In Lok Sabha Polls

in IPA Special
Jun 8, 2023   ·  

JD(S) Looking For Ways To Remain Relevant After Debacle In Karnataka Polls

in IPA Special
Jun 8, 2023   ·  

Law Commission’s Backing Of Section 124A Of Sedition Law Is Disappointing

in IPA Special
Jun 8, 2023   ·  

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow us on
Up Next: Shah Commits Blunders In His Bid To Checkmate Mamata
©2020 -2021 India Press Agency, All Rights Reserved.
Newspack by India Press Agency | Statement of Ownership | Contact Us
logo
  • Home
  • now
  • politics
  • business
  • markets